Forests are integral components of the global climate, yet the material products that trees provide are essential to sustain human quality of life (e.g., paper, fuel, lumber, poles, fruit, etc.). While production forestry occurs throughout North America, Oregon and Washington are the United States largest leading producers of forest products. In western Oregon and Washington, the dominant commercial tree species is Douglas-fir, which is planted at a density of 400-450 trees per acre and harvested on a 40-45 year rotation.
For most tree species in the Pacific Northwest, the first five years after planting is the most vulnerable period in which trees are exposed to damage by most wildlife (e.g., deer, elk, voles, gophers, rabbits/hares, mountain beavers). However, wildlife damage also occurs after stand development, such as when trees are peeled by black bears and porcupines.
can result in the following:
Delayed harvest cycles
Failure to replace trees after a harvest or a fire
Failure to establish native plants to increase forest diversity,
improve riparian areas, revegetate disturbed sites, restore endangered
or threatened plants, or create or improve wildlife habitat.
Additionally, North American beavers damage trees by direct take (e.g., gnawing, cutting, clipping) of all sizes classes (seedling, sapling, pole, mature) and by flooding forest stands through dam building. In addition to timber damage, beaver damming activity also causes damage to agricultural crops and transportation networks. Damage that floods and/or weakens roads, highways, and railways, also leads to risk in human health and safety.
Managing resources to resolve these problems is becoming increasingly
difficult. The land base to produce timber is shrinking. This declining
base restricts options, while increasing the necessity to protect remaining
resources. Historical approaches to reducing forest damage problems
are under increasing scrutiny as the public demands more humane means
to resolve wildlife conflicts. Additionally, conflicting management
objectives frequently impede attempts to resolve problems. One manager
may be attempting to reduce damage on a timber stand, while concurrently
an adjacent landowner is working to increase wildlife populations. The
combined result is the critical need for increased and enhanced research
and outreach programs. New nonlethal approaches need to be identified
and existing approaches improved. Additional research is necessary to identify and quantify the true economic impacts of wildlife on intensively managed tree plantations. Improved cost-benefit analyses will provide forest managers with knowledge to refine forest management strategies.
Project Leader: Dr.
Jimmy D. Taylor,
321 Richardson Hall
3180 SW Jefferson Way
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331
Factsheet on Research Project
Goal and Objectives
Corvallis, OR, Field Station