The National Animal Health Laboratory Network
Supplemental 2002 Homeland
Security funding allowed VS
to put in place a pilot version of the NAHLN, a network of Federal
and State resources intended to enable a rapid and sufficient response
to animal health emergencies. California, Colorado, Georgia, Texas,
and Wisconsin received $2 million for increased biosecurity level-3
lab space and for equipment and reporting. Laboratories in Arizona,
Florida, Louisiana, Iowa, New York, North Carolina, and Washington
received $750,000 for equipment, reporting systems, and training.
The laboratories participating in the pilot project, publicly funded
laboratories, university laboratories, and other private facilities
provide varying animal health diagnostic services in each State,
including export certification, some disease surveillance and other
related tasks. NVSL
in Ames, IA, and Plum Island, NY, provide Federal animal health
diagnostic services—including FAD
diagnosis and confirmation.
The concept of the NAHLN reconfigures animal health diagnostic
services in the United States by positioning NVSL
as the lead U.S. animal health laboratory and allowing select laboratories
operated by State and university officials to cooperate in FAD surveillance
and related services. Such an arrangement will enhance all of the
various U.S. animal health diagnostic services, speed response efforts
should a FAD be detected in the United States, and lend greater
credibility to U.S. animal health export certification.
In 2000, leaders from AAVLD
and NVSL met to discuss strategic issues regarding animal health
diagnostic services in the United States. The proposal for NAHLN
grew out of this meeting and several AAVLD resolutions passed during
its annual meeting in 2000. Specifically, AAVLD proposed a cooperative
partnership with USDA
to promote and protect animal health in the United States; create
uniform animal health diagnostic standards and methods; and foster
international awareness that animal health in the United States
is monitored closely by both State and Federal officials.
Modernizing the national animal health diagnostic system will further
strengthen USDA's agricultural safeguarding system and improve upon
our working relationships with State officials and the scientific
community. Past events such as the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak
in Great Britain in 2001 have shown the devastating effects that
can occur from even a slight delay in detecting a highly infectious
animal disease agent in the livestock population. By increasing
the number of officials and laboratory facilities that are looking
for signs of FAD in the United States and using standardized laboratory
and reporting procedures, VS is in a better position to respond
swiftly and comprehensively to a disease detection.
|