USDA - APHIS - Regulations and Assessments
Environmental Compliance |
|
 |
Integrating National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Strategies
with Other Strategies
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations require Federal
agencies to "Integrate the requirements of NEPA with other planning and environmental
review procedures required by law or by agency practice so that all such procedures
run concurrently rather than consecutively" (40 CFR• 1500.2), and reduce
excessive paperwork by "Integrating NEPA requirements with other environmental
review and consultation requirements" (40 CFR • 1500.4(k)) and by "Combining
environmental documents with other documents" (40 CFR• 1500.4(o)). CEQ's
procedural requirements (including those for integration of compliance strategies)
are binding on Federal agencies, "except in cases where compliance would be
inconsistent with other statutory requirements" (40 CFR• 1500.3).
To the fullest extent possible, agencies should prepare EIS's concurrently
with and integrated with environmental impact analyses, surveys, and studies
required by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.),
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and other environmental
review laws and executive orders (40 CFR •1502.25). "Any environmental
document in compliance with NEPA may be combined with any other agency document
to reduce duplication and paperwork." (40 CFR • 1506.4).
The CEQ also requires agencies to cooperate with State and local agencies,
thereby eliminating duplication, through: (1) joint planning processes, (2)
joint environmental research and studies, (3) joint public hearings (except
where otherwise provided by statute, and (4) joint environmental assessments
(EA's) and environmental impact statements (EIS's) (40 CFR • 1506.2).
EIS's are required to discuss inconsistencies of proposed actions with any
approved State or local plans and laws (whether or not federally sanctioned).
Even separate Federal NEPA compliance strategies may be integrated through " adoption" of
documents, another procedure advocated by CEQ (40 CFR • 1506.3). Agencies
may adopt either draft EIS's or final EIS's or portions thereof, provided they
meet appropriate CEQ standards. If the agency can conclude that the proposed
actions are substantially the same and (for cooperating agencies) conclude
after an independent review that comments and suggestions have been satisfied,
it may adopt the statement as a final statement without recirculating it for
comment as a draft.
There can be a multitude of considerations for agencies regarding integration
of NEPA compliance strategies with other strategies (Federal and non-Federal).
For example, these considerations may be political (coping with conflicting
regulations and requirements), economic (keeping costs down and documents concise),
or ideological (reconciling different perceptions relative to environmental
risk). APHIS' pest and disease control programs have potential to affect endangered
and threatened species, and the integration of NEPA and ESA compliance strategies
is challenging for the Agency. Refer to the section of this manual titled "Endangered
Species Act Compliance--Special Considerations" for greater detail on this
process.
Last Modified:
February 1, 2007
|
|