| |
Press Releases
Publications
Factsheets
Popular
Pubs
Scientific
& Technical Pubs
Industry
Alerts & Tech Notes
Videos
Art &
Symbols
Email
Us

Privacy Statement
EEO Statement
USDA
| MRP
APHIS Home Page
|
|
Stakeholders Announcement
USDA Releases Interpretive Report on Nutrient Management at U.S. Dairies
Veterinary Services
November 10, 2004
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, through its National Animal Health Monitoring System
(NAHMS), released an interpretive report entitled Nutrient Management
and the U.S. Dairy Industry in 2002. The report was compiled from
data collected during the Dairy 2002 study. The report takes an in–depth
look at nutrient management practices on U.S. dairy farms. APHIS is
providing copies of the report to producers and industry stakeholders
across the country.
In 1991, NAHMS conducted the National Dairy Heifer Evaluation Project
(NDHEP). Through this project, NAHMS published baseline information
on heifer health, illnesses and management practices, as well as prevalence
estimates for Cryptosporidium, Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and
Salmonella.
The NAHMS’ Dairy ‘96 study built on the results of the
NDHEP. Objectives of the Dairy ‘96 study included estimating the
national prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (Johne’s
disease), bovine leukosis virus, and fecal shedding of E.coli 0157 and
Salmonella in adult dairy cows.
The NAHMS’ Dairy 2002 study continued to address issues important
to the U.S. dairy industry, which included changes in baseline dairy
cattle health and management practices; strategies to address Johne’s
disease; management factors associated with the presence of certain
food safety pathogens; preparedness of producers to respond to foreign
animal diseases; and a profile of animal waste handling systems used
on U.S. dairy
operations.
A few highlights from Nutrient Management and the U.S. Dairy Industry
in 2002 are as follows:
- Bulk tank somatic cell counts (BTSCCs) are commonly used to ascertain
the overall udder health of a dairy herd. There does not appear to
be a correlation between manure handling methods and overall udder
health, as measured by BTSCCs. Operations reporting BTSCCs of less
than 400,000 used gutter cleaner and alley scraper as primary manure
handling methods. Gutter cleaner was the primary manure handling method
for the majority (46.8 percent) of operations with BTSCCs of 400,000
or more.
- The majority (49.3 percent) of small operations (less than 100 head)
stored manure as a solid in a manure spreader; 35.8 percent of medium
operations (100 to 499 head) stored manure in liquid form as slurry
or liquid manure stored in an earth basin and not treated and 28.8
percent of large operations (500 or more head) stored manure in liquid
form as slurry or liquid manure stored in an earth basin and not treated,
while 24.2 percent of large operations used a treatment lagoon as
a waste storage system.
- More than 5 out of 10 large operations analyzed manure for nutrient
content, compared to approximately 4 out of 10 medium operations and
less than 2 out of 10 small operations.
- The majority of large operations (52.9 percent) reported that the
minimum distance manure was applied from a body of water was 1,000
feet or more. For medium operations, 28.9 percent reported a minimum
distance of less than 100 feet, 29.4 percent a minimum distance of
100 to 499 feet and 35.3 percent reported a minimum distance of 1,000
feet or more.
- Roughly half of large and medium operations (55.8 percent and 48.4
percent, respectively) had written nutrient management plans, compared
to only 23.3 percent of small operations.
- During the Dairy 2002 study—and prior to the EPA’s revised
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) regulations—the
majority of large operations (55.3 percent) believed that their operations
would be classified as a CAFO. In contrast, 28.4 percent of medium
operations and 42.2 percent of small operations reported that they
had never heard of a CAFO. In addition, 37.8 of medium operations
and 33.4 percent of small operations believed that their operations
would most likely not be classified as a CAFO.
To request copies of the Nutrient Management and the U.S. Dairy Industry
in 2002 report or access future reports on APHIS’ veterinary services
Web site, go to http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ceah/cahm.
Note to Stakeholders: Stakeholder announcements and other APHIS information
are available on the Internet. Go to the APHIS home page at http://www.aphis.usda.gov
and click on the “Nes” button. For additional information
on this topic, contact Suzan Holl (301) 734-6464 or suzan.holl@aphis.usda.gov.
#
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,
or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office
of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964
(voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Click here for printable version
(PDF)
|
|