| |
Press Releases
Publications
Factsheets
Popular
Pubs
Scientific
& Technical Pubs
Industry
Alerts & Tech Notes
Videos
Art &
Symbols
Email
Us

Privacy Statement
EEO Statement
USDA
| MRP
APHIS Home Page
|
|
Stakeholder Announcement
U.S. Department of Agriculture Releases Interpretive Report on Biosecurity
Practices at U.S. Dairies
Veterinary Services
August 9, 2004
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Animal Health
Monitoring System (NAHMS) has released an interpretive report entitled
Animal Disease Exclusion Practices on U.S. Dairy Operations, 2002. The
report was compiled from data collected during the NAHMS Dairy 2002
study and takes an in–depth look at biosecurity practices on U.S.
dairy farms. Copies of the report have been shipped to producers and
other industry members across the country.
In 1991, NAHMS conducted the National Dairy Heifer Evaluation Project
(NDHEP). Through this project, baseline information on heifer health,
illnesses, and management practices, as well as prevalence estimates
for Cryptosporidium, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, and Salmonella were published.
In 1996, the NAHMS’ Dairy ‘96 study built on the results
of the NDHEP. Objectives of the Dairy ‘96 study included estimating
the national prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (Johne’s
disease), bovine leukosis virus, and fecal shedding of E. coli 0157
and Salmonella in adult dairy cows.
The NAHMS’ Dairy 2002 study continued to address issues important
to the U.S. dairy industry by describing: changes in baseline dairy
cattle health and management practices; strategies to address Johne’s
disease; management factors associated with the presence of certain
food safety pathogens; and a profile of animal waste handling systems
used on U.S. dairy operations.
Here are a few highlights from Animal Disease Exclusion Practices on
U.S. Dairy Operations, 2002:
- While most dairy producers reported at least knowing some basics
about foot–and–mouth
disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and Johne’s disease,
the majority of producers were essentially unfamiliar with heartwater,
screwworm, bluetongue, and vesicular stomatitis.
- Most dairy producers (92.8 percent) reported that they would very
likely contact their private
veterinary practitioner for disease information if a foreign animal
disease occurred in the United States.
- In 2001, nearly half (45.7 percent) of all dairies brought either
beef or dairy cattle onto their
operations.
- More than three–quarters of U.S. dairy operations (75.5 percent)
did not require testing of cattle before the cattle were introduced
onto the farm.
- Only one in five dairy operations (20.6 percent) that added new
cattle quarantined those cattle.
- Overall, 51.6 percent of operations required some type of vaccination
of incoming cattle.
Note to Stakeholders: Stakeholder announcements
and other APHIS information are available on the Internet. Go to the
APHIS home page at http://www.aphis.usda.gov and click on the “News”
button. For additional information on this topic, contact Suzan Holl
(301) 734-6464 or suzan.holl@aphis.usda.gov
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,
or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office
of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964
(voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Click here for printable version
(PDF)
|
|