| |
Press Releases
Publications
Factsheets
Popular
Pubs
Scientific
& Technical Pubs
Industry
Alerts & Tech Notes
Videos
Art &
Symbols
Email
Us

Privacy Statement
EEO Statement
USDA
| MRP
APHIS Home Page
|
|
Printable version (PDF)
APHIS Biotechnology: Permitting Progress into Tomorrow
Biotechnology Regulatory Services
October 2005
Genetically engineered (GE) organisms are big
news—corn that resist attacks by insect pests,
papayas that are resistant to viruses, and bananas
that might one day carry vaccines to developing
countries are all made possible by the science of
biotechnology. Newspapers and magazines regularly
announce the latest advancements in the great
biotechnology race. While many products are already
on the market, many more are being developed and
tested every day. As this technology rapidly
advances, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
(USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) is right there to ensure that the GE organisms
being created today do not pose a risk to plants
and the environment tomorrow. APHIS works to protect
America’s agriculture and environment using a
dynamic and science-based regulatory framework
that allows for the safe development and use of GE
organisms.
GE Organisms
Genetic engineering refers to the process in
which one or more genes and other genetic elements
from one or more organism(s) are inserted into the
genetic material of a second organism using recombinant
DNA techniques. Engineering a new gene or
genes into the second organism in this way allows
researchers and developers to introduce a particular
new trait, or traits. GE crops that can tolerate herbicides,
resist insects or viruses, or produce modified
fruit or flowers are just a few examples of crops currently
being grown and tested. Many of these crops
have been deregulated by APHIS and have also
completed the required reviews from the
Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and
Drug Administration. Significant acreages of these
crops are safely being grown by farmers today. In
2004, 40 percent of the corn, 81 percent of the soybeans,
and 73 percent of the cotton grown in the
United States were genetically engineered.
As technology advances, developers continue to
introduce new types of traits. Some crops under
development are not intended for food or feed. For
example, crops are being engineered to produce
compounds that will have pharmaceutical and industrial
uses.
USDA Regulation of GE Organisms
APHIS is responsible for protecting U.S. agriculture
from pests and diseases. Under the authority of
the Plant Protection Act, APHIS’ Biotechnology
Regulatory Services (BRS) regulates the introduction
of GE organisms in the United States. BRS refers to
these organisms as regulated articles. Regulated
articles are organisms that have been altered by or
produced through genetic engineering and have the
potential to be plant pests. Introduction includes any
movement into (import) or through (interstate) the
United States, or release into the environment that is
outside an area of physical confinement. A plant pest
is an organism that poses a direct or indirect risk to
other plants or plant products. The term is generally
applied to insects and diseases, but in the case of
USDA biotechnology regulation, it is applied to GE
organisms that have the potential to be plant pests.
The resulting GE organisms are not necessarily plant
pests; however, the review process that would
demonstrate they are not plant pests has not been
completed.
APHIS regulations provide a list of the organisms
regarded as plant pests so applicants know if the
organism they are developing is a plant pest. If the
organism being engineered is on the list, then the
engineered product will be considered to be a potential
plant pest until determined otherwise. If DNA
from any organism on the list was used to produce
the GE organism, the GE organism will be regarded
as a potential plant pest even if the parental organism
is not.
Two common examples of APHIS’ regulations
being invoked due to use of DNA in the engineering
process are plants that contain small fragments of
DNA from plant pests to control expression of new
traits; and plants which contain DNA from specific
plant viruses that cause the plant to be resistant to
that same virus. Even if the original organism itself is
not on the list and no DNA sequences from organisms
on the list were used in the engineering, it still
may be subject to APHIS regulations if it is an
unclassified organism or if there is reason to believe
that the resulting GE organism is or could be a plant
pest.
APHIS exercises its regulatory authority through
a system that includes both permits and notifications.
A developer wishing to introduce a GE organism
must obtain the necessary authorization before proceeding.
Applicants must submit all plans for movement,
importation, or field testing for thorough review
by BRS’ regulatory scientists. Depending on the
nature of the GE crop, an applicant files either a notification or a permit application for APHIS review. With
a notification, developers must adhere to specific criteria
and established performance standards. For a
permit application, BRS’ scientists evaluate any potential
plant pest risks posed by the organism and the
procedures that the developer will use for introduction
of the regulated article.
The Permit Process
APHIS–BRS conducts a more comprehensive
review of permit applications if they are used for GE
plants that could have an elevated risk, such as plants
that produce pharmaceutical or industrial compounds,
as well as for any GE organism other than plants.
Applicants must obtain permits for field testing or
movement of these GE organisms.
To apply for a permit, applicants must complete a
detailed form (APHIS Form 2000) that can be found
on the USDA–APHIS Web site at
<http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/pdf/2000.pdf>. This
application requires more-detailed information than a
notification application, including a detailed description
of how the developer will perform a field test or
move the GE organism. BRS often works with applicants
on field-test design protocols and may impose
additional measures to ensure confinement as part of
supplemental permit conditions. If portions of the
application contain trade secrets or confidential business
information (CBI), applicants submit two versions
of the application: one with CBI marked and included
and one with CBI marked and redacted. The CBIredacted
version is the edited version that is circulated
for review by officials outside APHIS, such as State
departments of agriculture.
Permit for Field Testing
On APHIS Form 2000, applicants must provide
complete information about the plant, including all
new genes and new gene products, their origin, the
purpose of the test, the experimental design (how the
test will be conducted), and precautions to be taken to
prevent the escape of the regulated article from the
field-test site.
These special precautions routinely include transporting
the plants to the field-test site in enclosed containers
and thoroughly cleaning test-plot equipment
before and after use. Depending on the plant being
field-tested, cross-pollination may be blocked by bagging
the flowers, growing crops in cages that keep
insects from carrying pollen out, removing the plants’
reproductive structures, or physically isolating the
plants from sexually compatible crops through mandatory
separation distances. After harvest, any remaining
vegetative material in a field-test site is allowed to
dry down in the field, followed by cultivation to incorporate
remaining plant parts into the soil. Test sites
are monitored for a period of time that varies depending
upon crop biology to prevent volunteer plants from
germinating. Any unplanned and unwanted plants
that sprout are destroyed.
When a permit application is submitted,
APHIS–BRS personnel review the permit application
for completeness and assign it to a scientific reviewer
who evaluates the proposed field test. APHIS–BRS
also contacts State agricultural officials where the field
test is proposed, to get their input. As part of the
review process for some permits, BRS prepares an
environmental assessment (EA), which is a document
that analyzes any possible impacts the field test could
have on the environment. The EA can be required by
the National Environmental Policy Act, Council on
Environmental Quality regulations, and USDA procedures.
One permit application can cover field tests in
more than one State. BRS personnel take into consideration
the scope and size of a field test when they
prepare an EA.
BRS has 120 days to send written approval or
denial of a permit application to the applicant. All field
tests are subject to inspection, and certain field tests
are always inspected. The number and scope of
inspections vary depending upon the type of product
being tested. For example, there are at least five
inspections conducted during the growing season of
GE plants that produce pharmaceutical compounds.
Permit for Movement or Importation
Applicants must also apply for permits for movement
or importation of a regulated article. Permit
applicants must provide APHIS with details about the
nature of the organism, its origin, confinement measures,
and intended use. As part of this process,
APHIS requests oncurrence of individual State
departments of agriculture prior to granting permission
for movement of any GE organism. APHIS and
State officials also inspect the facility that will receive
the organism to ensure that it will not be accidentally
released into the environment. In addition, the
inspectors will evaluate facilities, personnel, security,
and operational procedures of laboratories, growth
chambers, and greenhouses to ensure that National
Institutes of Health guidelines for good laboratory
practices are being followed.
BRS has 60 days to process movement permit
applications. Upon approval, permits are valid for 1
year from the date of issue and must be renewed if
additional plant material is moved or planted after that
time. In the case of the importation of a GE crop, an
applicant must submit an application for each shipment
of regulated articles.
The Notification Process: A Streamlined
Alternative to the Permit, for Qualifying
Plants
Most plants are field-tested under notification, a
streamlined process that takes up to 30 days for a
decision. Notifications are often used for GE plants
that are altered to be pest resistant or herbicide tolerant.
Applicants may use the notification process only
for certain crops that meet all six eligibility criteria,
based on their plant pest potential:
1. The GE plant is not listed as a Federal noxious
weed and is not considered a weed in the area of
introduction.
2. The genetic material must be “stably integrated”
into the plant genome.
3. The newly introduced gene’s function must be
known and not result in plant disease.
4. The genetic material must not cause production of
a plant pest, cause the plant to produce substances
that are toxic to nontarget organisms, or be genetically
engineered for the purpose of producing compounds
intended for pharmaceutical or industrial use.
5. The newly introduced gene must not cause the
creation of a new plant virus.
6. The plant must not have been modified to contain
genes from animal or human pathogens.
Applicants must sign a statement indicating that
they will conduct the test in a manner that meets the
performance standards listed in the APHIS regulations.
As part of the notification process, BRS
requires that applicants provide data, such as information
about the plant; descriptions of genetic modifications;
the source and identity of any genes introduced;
and the size, duration, and location of the field
test. If a plant does not meet the eligibility criteria for
a notification, researchers must submit an application
for a permit for BRS to consider allowing a field test.
CBI information for notifications is handled in the
same manner as described above for permits.
Petition for Nonregulatory Status
After a GE crop has been field-tested extensively
and the developer can show that the product does not
pose a plant pest risk and can safely be removed
from BRS oversight, the developer may file a petition
for deregulation, or nonregulatory status. APHIS
reviews the petition for completeness and often asks
for additional data. Once sufficient data have been
received, the petition is deemed complete. From this
point, APHIS has up to 180 days to either approve or
deny an application. After review of the complete
data, BRS prepares an EA to analyze the potential
impacts the crop may have on the environment and
seeks public comment.
BRS publishes Federal Register notices to notify the
public about a 60-day comment period for the EA and
the petition itself. BRS then posts the EA and the
petition on its Web site for public viewing.
BRS makes a determination of nonregulatory status
for a petition only when it can conclude that the
organism does not pose a plant pest risk and reaches
a finding of no significant impact (FONSI). Once BRS
has granted a product nonregulatory status, the product
may be freely moved and planted without the
requirement of permits or other regulatory oversight
by BRS. Following USDA deregulation, these products
are often commercialized after completing the
reviews required by other Federal agencies. BRS has
the authority to bring any deregulated item back under
regulation if new information becomes available that
demonstrates unanticipated effects or plant health
risks. This authority, however, has never been used,
and deregulated products have an established history
of safe use in U.S. agriculture.
Additional Information
For more information about the permitting of GE
organisms, contact
USDA–APHIS–BRS
Regulatory Division, Permit Staff
4700 River Road, Unit 136
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236
or visit the BRS Web site at
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. , Washington , D.C. 20250–9410 , or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
• Safeguarding American Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • United States Department of Agriculture•
|
|