The rulemaking process is the same for PPQ and VS. It has as a
prominent feature a procedure for eliciting public comment that
demonstrates how the United States adheres to the SPS Principle of
transparency.
Remember that the SPS Principle of Transparency is that each member
country will demonstrate openness of their domestic rulemaking
process which affects trade by:
- publishing its requirements
- providing advanced notification of any changes in SPS requirements
that may affect trade
- make available the scientific basis for the proposed action
- allow countries an opportunity to comment on the proposed action
If the determination in the rulemaking process is to propose that
entry for the commodity be allowed, prior to issuing a rule that
amends the list of enterable commodities, there is a public notice
and comment process. This process is required by the Administrative
Procedure Act and usually lasts 60 days. This Act stipulates that the
public receive notice with information about a proposed change in
regulations or procedures so that people have a chance to comment
and with information about the time at which the rule is slated to
go into effect. The proposal is published in the Federal Register,
published every business day. It explains the proposed rule and invites
comments within a given time period.
Proposed rules can be and frequently are changed during this comment
process prior to becoming a final rule. The process often takes time,
at least a year or two, because the rule needs to be reviewed outside
of USDA by the Office of Management and Budget. The final rule is
then published in the Federal Register along with the comments made
during the public notice process. Eventually the rule is published
in the Code of Federal Regulations, published once a year. In recent
years information has become much more easily and quickly obtainable
through the Internet. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations are both published on the Internet. At this point a
commodity becomes enterable.
An important principle during this review process is that all input is
on the record. There can be no closed-door sessions or "ex parte"
communication during this process in the interest of fairness and of
transparency. Any attempt to influence the comment period outside of
the open input process may backfire. The basis for most lawsuits
challenges the science (PRA). If there has been an attempt to influence
rulemaking outside of the open comment process it may become the basis
for a lawsuit, which can delay the entire process for years or it may
kill the proposed rule altogether.
A printable PDF of the rulemaking process is available. You will need
to download the PDF reader if it is not already installed on your
computer. Then, click on the Rulemaking PDF to download. It will
open in a new window. To return to this module, simply close or
minimize the browser window with the Rulemaking module.